Title: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 08, 2007, 10:47:58 PM I've started to take this away into my own style now. I've switched the piano for two guitars, dropped the percussion (for now) and extended the piece with a 3rd verse variation.
It is still a bit rough. The guitars in particular need to be aligned a bit better in places, and I might change them a bit more to give greater seperation. As usual comments are welcome. <edit> Oh dear, cold light of dawn :( Using guitar definitely does not work. It completely fails the 'Next Room' test (where I literally walk into an adjacent room) and just sounds muddled. I will have to think of something else! Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 12, 2007, 09:08:07 PM Update! I've replaced the file with a version that has the extension but no guitar or drums. Ideas welcome Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: offthewall on September 12, 2007, 10:25:22 PM :-*
Once again, this is a beautiful piece, in my view. If you wish to elaborate on this by adding 'real' guitar, and anything else that fits, I would be most happy to take a 'collab' for this one.......maybe for the next Kara-Moon CD ? It is certainly the sort of composition that 'grabs me by the lugs' as we geordies say!! Let me know......I'll be happy to oblige, Will. ;) James Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: kara on September 13, 2007, 06:47:34 AM I think I know what could make this song better....
The melody is a bot too syncopated and laks fluidity. I think it would gain a lot from been plaid by a windcontroller. Do you have a score for the melody (or a midi file)? I could ask Azell to play it on here windcontroller Just an idea k Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 13, 2007, 09:56:14 PM :-* Thanks James. Yes I'd certainly be interested in that. Not sure how the best way is to go about that. I could probably put a wav or flac file on my website if you want the highest quality base recording, but see Kara's post too!Once again, this is a beautiful piece, in my view. If you wish to elaborate on this by adding 'real' guitar, and anything else that fits, I would be most happy to take a 'collab' for this one.......maybe for the next Kara-Moon CD ? It is certainly the sort of composition that 'grabs me by the lugs' as we geordies say!! Let me know......I'll be happy to oblige, Will. ;) James Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 13, 2007, 10:00:58 PM I think I know what could make this song better.... That sounds an interesting idea.The melody is a bot too syncopated and laks fluidity. I think it would gain a lot from been plaid by a windcontroller. Do you have a score for the melody (or a midi file)? I could ask Azell to play it on here windcontroller Just an idea k MIDI would be the way I would have to go. Would you want a midi file of just the melody, or the whole piece? It is actually only 6 tracks! I could also let you have the ZynAddSubFX parameter file if you wanted to do a whole reconstruction. Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: offthewall on September 13, 2007, 10:33:23 PM I would be interested.....when you think that you have a finished 'length' of piece, just send a wav or mp3 file and I will put it in Reaper and just 'noodle' round it. If anything good comes out I can send you the 'good' files for you to remix......or I can ask you for better individual files......
take it as it comes? ;) James Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: kara on September 14, 2007, 06:51:26 AM Folderol
Can you post a mp3 mix without the melody & the midi file. That way I can print the score for Azell and ask here to play the melody James could then add a counter melody with his flute Sound like a good plan, what do you think ? James ok ? k Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: offthewall on September 14, 2007, 07:27:30 AM Yup
;) Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 14, 2007, 07:04:02 PM Okey dokey here we go ;D
Hmmm, that's the mp3 file but how do I attach the midi one? Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: kara on September 14, 2007, 07:28:16 PM As a zip file ? ;D
I've just changed the forum settings, normaly you should be able to attach *.mid files now k Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 14, 2007, 07:40:24 PM As a ... duh!
Thanks for opening .mid I've attached it now. The melody starts at bar 9. Not quite sure what the Rosegarden -> MIDI conversion will think of 8 bars of silence! P.S. Without the melody on top I think I hear a couple of suspects chords in the last verse :( Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: kara on September 14, 2007, 08:15:44 PM no worries, midi is midi
as it is just data it shows up correctly in any sequencer k Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: kara on September 15, 2007, 02:25:03 PM working on the song, expect something for tomorrow evening
k Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 15, 2007, 02:59:31 PM :) :D ;D
Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: offthewall on September 15, 2007, 05:38:31 PM Will,
I'm trying to find some time to look at this. Could you let me know the chord sequence to save me a bit of 'messing about'. Thanks ;) James Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: kara on September 15, 2007, 07:17:49 PM ok Will, a litle sound check
you have 3 choices : 1. Clarinet 2. Flute 3. Don't like it, forget it k Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 15, 2007, 07:38:38 PM Clarinet, definitely :)
I couldn't download the 3rd option so dismissed it straight away ;D Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: kara on September 15, 2007, 08:03:05 PM ok,....
Azell just told me you have more taste then I have, I prefered the flute ::) ;D k Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 15, 2007, 08:19:18 PM Will, Oops. Nearly missed this :-\I'm trying to find some time to look at this. Could you let me know the chord sequence to save me a bit of 'messing about'. Thanks ;) James verses 1, 2 & 4 C(2), Dm(1), Dm(2), Em(1), C(1), C(2), Dm(1), Bdim(2), C(2), Dm(1), Em(2), F(1), Em(1), Bdim(2), C(1) - 2 bars verse 3 F(1), F, Bb, F, C(1), C(2), Dm(1), F, C(2), Dm(1), Em(2), F(1), Em(1), Bdim(2), C(1) - 2 bars The bracketed terms are the chord inversion. You'll see the 3rd verse lines up with the others on its 9th bar. Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: offthewall on September 15, 2007, 09:25:58 PM Thanks Will.
Quote P.S. dunno how to get a 'flat' symbol Well, I would just go for 'little bee'.....as in 'Bb' ;) James Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 15, 2007, 09:48:15 PM Done
... and two wrongly identified chords corrected too! Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: offthewall on September 15, 2007, 10:05:46 PM Yup,
just found them myself. ::) J Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: kara on September 16, 2007, 01:29:35 PM okay :D
Let us know what you think of this Azell asked me to tell you 2 things If you compose for windplayers please consider 2 things > Give them some air from time to time ;D > When you put accidentials in your melody don't make them too short, the air has to have a change to flow... You turn now James 8) k Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: offthewall on September 16, 2007, 04:50:21 PM I'll try to get somthing done with this tomorrow.
:-X James Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 16, 2007, 06:22:56 PM okay :D Let us know what you think of this Azell asked me to tell you 2 things If you compose for windplayers please consider 2 things > Give them some air from time to time ;D > When you put accidentials in your melody don't make them too short, the air has to have a change to flow... You turn now James 8) k playing is good, and timing much smoother than my line. I can see the problems with some of my 'twiddles', but then the only wind instrument I've ever played (not well) was a penny whistle which can respond much faster of course. I had tried to leave some breath space, but obviously not enough, or in the wrong places :( But, erm, I thought we were going with the clarinet ??? That's the flutiest clarinet I've ever heard :o Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 16, 2007, 06:25:47 PM I'll try to get somthing done with this tomorrow. Great.:-X James You've got lots of clear 'headroom' so please feel free to fill it :) P.S> We can fight with kara about the clarinet later ;D Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: kara on September 16, 2007, 06:29:03 PM For the sound, I actually tought of something that would go well with the pennywistle of James
We'll see how it works out... k Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: offthewall on September 16, 2007, 10:37:41 PM :D
OK.....first try! I've simply taken Kara's version and tried to compliment Azell's beautiful 'clarinet' playing. What I would like to do (when I can find the time) is to have an extended version, maybe twice as long, and put in a 'Marc Knopfler' style guitar....way in the background with loads of 'verb......! Anyway....this is today's quick version! ;) James Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 17, 2007, 08:42:19 PM The sound of the whistle works well in the mix (still think we need a clarinet though), and I see the outline you are following, but I wonder if the piece is actually too slow or indistinct, as you seem rather hesitant. Would a click track or line help do you think? Mind you I'm probably being a bit unfair as it's your first shot at an unfamiliar tune.
I would like to hear a Knopfler style guitar backing this. That would be really good. How would you envisage it being extended, repeat verses or new variations? P.S. I consider myself fortunate that nobody will ever hear my first attempt at the original melody :P Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: offthewall on September 17, 2007, 10:02:30 PM Will,
I'm just listening again as I read your comments and can see what you mean. However....this was intentional, as a sort of 'echo' style to attempt to supplement the main instrument without detracting from it, if you understand. :-\ This is why I would like to have an extended version. My opinion (FWIW) is that a musical theme should be allowed to develop so the listener recognises the structure......then let that structure support a bit of 'interpretation'. If the interpretation is applied before the poor listener has 'got his lugs in' (as they say in my part of the world), it usually makes a mess of the main theme. :-X Anyway, I enjoyed doing this and would like to take it further. (by the way, I quite like the 'clarinet') At this point I can hear just the whole repeated.....unless you can come up with a suitable variation....maybe a longish bridge section then finish with V3 and V4. Thank you for your music.....it's lovely! ;) James Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 19, 2007, 07:05:18 PM Ok, I broadly agree with what you are saying here.
What I'm thinking now is to add a bridging section as you suggest, but making it perform a key change too (probably up a 4th) to a final repeat of V3 & V4. How does this sound James & Kara? As this is all keyboard stuff for me, I can easily change key if that would make it easier for 'real' instrument players. Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: offthewall on September 19, 2007, 09:28:37 PM Yup,
So that would move it from C to F ? If so, that's fine with me. ;) James Title: Re: Green Hills (revisited) Post by: folderol on September 23, 2007, 07:37:02 PM Hi,
I haven't forgotten. This will take a bit of time to sort out. 'Life not found - press anything to continue' |